Nature or Nurture: Tennis Champions

John Newcombe, former world tennis No 1 andFor instance, some people are born with a body
former Australian Davis Cup captain, once saidstructure conducive to speed, others to strength,
that the top Australian players of his era believedand so on. In this sense, a very large proportion
that it was their destiny to become tennisof the population are excluded, from birth, from
champions.ever winning an Olympic gold medal as a sprinter
Boris Becker told me that two weeks beforeor a weightlifter.
achieving his first Wimbledon title (in 1985 whenIt is the same with tennis. The physical attributes
seventeen years old), he felt as if it werethat are required to become a champion player
predetermined.are such things as good hand-eye coordination,
As a seventeen year old, Ivan Lendl, who, priorquick reflexes, and leg-speed. Without question,
to Pete Sampras, held the No 1 spot longer thanthese attributes can be developed to their fullest
any other player in history, was convinced that hepotential with hard work and effective training
would turn himself into the best player in themethods.
world. He would even tell you so.But most people are excluded from becoming the
When asked by the media about his chances ofbest tennis player in the world, no matter how
winning his first US Open title (in 1975), Jimmymuch time they spend attempting to reach their
Connors' response was: "There are 127 losers inphysical ceiling of potential.
the draw -- and me!"Does this mean, then, that champions are born?
Jimmy won.Were Newcombe, Becker, Lendl and Connors so
What these former greats had in common wasphysically superior to everyone else that
an unshakeable certainty that they would win. It isbecoming the best was just a mere formality?
a trait that is shared by all top sports people.Certainly not. All four were exceptionally gifted
But a question that has always fascinated me is:physically, but in my view, there were other
Are such champions born, or are they made?players of the same eras who were more gifted
Were Newccombe, Becker, Lendl and Connorsthan they were.
born to rule the tennis world? Or did theyWhat separated them from everyone else were
become champions because of the choices theytheir mental attributes: their will to win, their
made? Was their success predetermined, asdetermination, their perseverance, their ability to
suggested by Newcombe and Becker? Or was itremain calm under presuure, their ability to bounce
a result of a single-minded dedication to makingback from disappointments, and the belief that
themselves the very best, as implied by Lendl andthey deserved to win -- all attributes that not one
Connors?of us is born with, but that each one of us has
Are champions a product of nature? Or ofthe power to develop. The only choice is whether
nurture?we want to or not.
To be a true champion at tennis or any otherIt is in this sense that, given the necessary or
sport requires very special qualities. These qualitiesessential physical attributes as a starting point, all
or attributes can be divided into two categories --champions are not only made -- they are
the physical and the mental. It is my contentionself-made.
that physical attributes are predominantly aFind tips about volleyball serve and volleyball
product of chance. They are determinedterms at the Volleyball Drills website.
genetically.